According
to Chapter 31, Networks, Web 2.0, and the Connected Learner of “Trends and
Issues in Instructional Design and Technology” by Reiser and Dempsey whom focus
on the Web 2.0 applications and how we can use those tools to exemplifies some
of the concepts or characteristics. In this paper, I will reflect upon the Web
2.0 tools that we played with them over the semester, discuss two of my favorite
applications, why they are my favorites and note how they exemplify some of the
concepts or characteristics detailed in this week's reading.
I
believe that the most useful application that I played with it is creating a
video and image as a screencast and hotscreen by Jing. I think this website
will save my time in career future because I can use it with my students to
explain sequences steps in short and clear video. So, the students can learn by
watching the instructor move through the steps enables them to take note of
where everything is in the application or presentation. For that free website,
Jing offers the capability to explain in detail what may be more confusing when
delivered in audio or the written word. Video allows the screencast producer to
complete the flow of thoughts or processes without being forced to chop or
forget some steps into static images. With the combination of video and audio,
the application can mimic the one on one experience of the classroom, deliver
clear, and complete instruction.
Another
Web application that I fell in love it is Google Drive is that it is an online
file cabinet where you can store documents and other digital files. Also, it
provides similar services of Microsoft Office Applications and more. I believe
that Google Drive is the best choice to collaborate with students for several
reasons. First, it is a free application. Second, it saves the work
automatically. Third and the most important reason is allowing for multiple
users to work on the same document, insert comments in the margins, or just let
others take a peek at what they are working on. This means students cannot only
work together with their own classmates, but they could also collaborate with
students across the world.
So, how
do these two tools exemplify Web 2.0, as defined by the reading this week? One
of the affordances described within the chapter by Reiser and Dempsey (2007),
is the networking, collaborative, connectivity provided through Web 2.0 tools.
Google Docs exemplifies this collaborative, networked, connected environment.
As I said above the Google drive contributes with effective cooperate in the
educational environment.
For the
screencasting tool, I believe it provides students with an opportunity to learn
from professionals and experienced faculty members on various subjects.
Moreover, students can get the information easily, which saves their time
instead of spending lots time on YouTube or reading some explanations.
Screencasting is a good source of information and it can easily be published
and shared that make them effective tools for tutoring video.
No comments:
Post a Comment